安楽亭Anrakutei

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). Some dishes carry the heading 「根岸店限定」 (Negishi restaurant only), showing that the dish is limited to that restaurant. Some dishes carry the note 「＊はちみつが含まれております」 (contains honey), but honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). Some dishes carry the heading 「店舗限定」 (certain restaurants only), showing that the dish is limited to some restaurants. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. One recommended-labeling item — almond — has not been confirmed across every product and has no column of its own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed it is that noted directly in the dish's name. Macadamia nut and pistachio have no column here either, but this document does not say why. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). In this document, dish names carry the printed notes 「※アレルゲンにアーモンドを含みます」, 「※アレルゲンにアーモンド・マカダミアを含みます」 and 「※アレルゲンにマカダミアを含みます」; their wording does not match what the preamble promises, and macadamia nut is shortened to 「マカダミア」. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it. Some dishes carry a heading such as 「根岸店限定」(Negishi restaurant only, on the hearth-grilled sweets section) or 「数量限定」(limited quantity, on the white peach grated jelly), showing that the dish is limited to that restaurant or to limited stock. Some dish names, such as the sweet potato butter and the honey-grilled camembert, also carry the note 「＊はちみつが含まれております」 (contains honey), but honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — are described by the document as still being prepared for disclosure, because they have not been confirmed across every product, so this table gives no answer for them as columns. The table therefore cannot be read as saying that a dish does not contain any one of these three. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it. Some dishes, such as 「カレーライス ＊はちみつが含まれております」(curry rice — contains honey), carry a note that they contain honey, even though honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). In this document, dish names carry the printed note 「※アレルゲンにアーモンドを含みます」, whose wording does not match what the preamble promises. Also, the salted lemon butter on page 1 carries the note 「＊はちみつが含まれております」 (contains honey), but honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). The document carries the note 「下記メニューにはサラダの選べるドレッシングの栄養価・アレルゲン表記は含まれません」 (the menus below do not include the nutrition values or allergen marks of the salad's selectable dressings). It also carries the note 「松阪牛使用メニューには別添えで下記を提供いたします」 (for menus using Matsusaka beef, the following are provided on the side), and the side salt, wasabi and soy sauce appear as separate rows in the table. The wasabi and soy sauce rows are marked ○ for wheat, with the source noted as a seasoning. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it. Some dishes carry a heading such as 「店舗限定」(certain restaurants only), 「根岸店限定」(Negishi restaurant only) or 「大井松田店限定」(Oi-Matsuda restaurant only) in the dish name or section heading, showing that the dish is limited to those restaurants. The document itself says it lists restaurant-limited menu items and asks readers to check with each restaurant about whether they are on sale.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). The document carries the note 「松阪牛使用メニューには別添えで下記を提供いたします」 (for menus using Matsusaka beef, the following are provided on the side), and the side salt, wasabi and soy sauce appear as separate rows in the table. The wasabi and soy sauce rows are marked ○ for wheat, with the source noted as a seasoning. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it. Some dishes carry a heading such as 「店舗限定」(certain restaurants only, on the domestic beef lean-cut & misuji set), 「大井松田店限定」(Oi-Matsuda restaurant only, on the section centered on the Matsusaka beef kalbi set) or 「根岸店限定」(Negishi restaurant only, on the hot-pot set meal section), showing that the dish is limited to that restaurant.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). The beef, pork and chicken headings print 「＊記載がない焼肉の味付けは醤油タレとなります」 (the seasoning of any yakiniku not otherwise stated is soy sauce tare). In this document, dish names carry the printed note 「※アレルゲンにアーモンドを含みます」, whose wording does not match what the preamble promises. Some dishes carry the note 「＊はちみつが含まれております」 (contains honey), but honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it. Some dishes carry a heading such as 「根岸店限定」(Negishi restaurant only), 「大井松田店限定」(Oi-Matsuda restaurant only) or 「店舗限定」(certain restaurants only) in the dish name, showing that the dish is limited to that restaurant (for example, the Negishi-only rib roast, seared-and-shabu-style beef tongue, lamb items and shabu-shabu meat, and the Oi-Matsuda-only Matsusaka beef kalbi and Matsusaka beef cut kalbi).

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). The row 「コンビサラダ（※ドレッシング表記除く）」 (combination salad, dressing marks excluded) does not include the dressing's marks; the dressings are listed separately under 「▼選べるドレッシング」 (selectable dressings). Some dishes carry the headings 「根岸店限定」 (Negishi restaurant only) or 「店舗限定」 (certain restaurants only), showing that the dish is limited to those restaurants. Some dishes carry the note 「＊はちみつが含まれております」 (contains honey), but honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). In this document, a dish name carries the printed note 「※アレルゲンにマカダミアを含みます」; its wording does not match what the preamble promises, and macadamia nut is shortened to 「マカダミア」. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it. Some dishes carry the heading 「根岸店限定」(Negishi restaurant only) in the dish name, showing that the dish (the hot-pot broth, the hot-pot finishing dish, and the hearth-grilled dessert section) is limited to that restaurant. Some dish names — the curry roux in the kids' curry set, the sweet-potato-and-butter dish, the French toast, and the honey-baked camembert, among others — also carry the note 「＊はちみつが含まれております」(contains honey), even though honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). In this document, dish names carry the printed note 「※アレルゲンにアーモンドを含みます」, whose wording does not match what the preamble promises. The document carries the note 「※はちみつを使用しております」 (uses honey), but honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. Three recommended-labeling items — almond, macadamia nut and pistachio — have not been confirmed across every product and have no column of their own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed one of them is that noted directly in the dish's name. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.

This table shows, across 26 items — the nine items egg, wheat, milk, shrimp, crab, buckwheat, peanut, walnut and cashew nut, plus 17 more (soybean, chicken, pork, beef, abalone, squid, mackerel, salmon, salmon roe, yam, orange, kiwi, peach, apple, banana, gelatin and sesame) — whether a dish "contains" the allergen (○) or carries a "possible trace-contamination" risk (▲). The document carries the note 「ユッケジャンスープセット ※セットのユッケジャンスープを栄養価・アレルゲン表記に含みます。詳細は下部オプションメニューをご覧ください。」 (the set's yukgaejang soup is included in the nutrition and allergen marks; see the option menu below for details). Some dishes carry the note 「＊はちみつが含まれております」 (contains honey), but honey is not one of the 26 items this table covers. Cashew nut is the one column whose heading is abbreviated, as 「Cナッツ」. A cell with neither mark is not left blank: the document prints a dash there. Neither this document nor the chain's allergen information page ever says what that dash means, so it cannot be read as "does not contain" — it can only be taken as marking a cell the table does not answer. Abalone and salmon roe carry that dash on every dish in this document; neither column has a single ○ or ▲. One recommended-labeling item — almond — has not been confirmed across every product and has no column of its own in this table. Only when a product's specification sheet has confirmed it is that noted directly in the dish's name. Macadamia nut and pistachio have no column here either, but this document does not say why. For wheat and sesame specifically, whenever the mark is ○ the table adds a further note on where the allergen comes from (a wheat-based product vs. a seasoning such as soy sauce or miso for wheat; roasted sesame seeds and the like vs. sesame oil for sesame). The document states that it does not show nutrition figures for a table sauce being added. The chain also states that the menu and ingredients can differ by restaurant and that, even for a dish with the same name, ingredients can change depending on circumstances, and it asks customers to check the latest version when they use it.

A PDF whose full text can be extracted. The column headers spell out each item's name one character per row, which reads awkwardly on screen, but the content is text, not an image.